I'm only doing my job

23 March, 2007

I have just been watching the news and had a little shock. The medical profession is starting to blame those who drink wine at home for the number of alcohol-related illnesses and deaths each year. I'm only young myself (21 ) but I feel quite strongly that while I'm recommending two bottles of wine to go with a meal, as well as making the customer aware of our three-for -two deal, I am now going to be selling wine to people who would, eight times out of 10, drink all three bottles in one night.

Should I be held responsible for people becoming ill just because I sold them that extra bottle? I'm only doing my job. Or maybe next Threshers would be held responsible for the said illnesses or deaths for running such a deal?

I feel that I do my best sometimes when suggesting the three-for -two deals as I say to the customers: "Well, if you want to take advantage of the deal but don't trust yourself not to drink all the bottles in one go, then leave the m here and pick them up one at a time. That way, you only have one bottle at home." Quite a few regular customers take advantage of this offer and think it's a great idea.

It's going to be funny to watch who gets blamed next - glassmakers for making bigger-sized glasses maybe?

Hayley Fraser

Sales assistant

Wine Rack, Hitchin

Bookmark this

Site Search


Faith in fakes

One of the most fascinating stories in wine, fit to stand alongside the Judgement of Paris, is that of Rudy Kurniawan, a man who managed to fool friends, auction houses and experts into believing they were drinking some of the world’s most expensive wines.

Click for more »
Upcoming events


Is blended Scotch overshadowed by single malt in retailers?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't know